This report reads the CertReports index as of 26 Oct 2026: 15,529 public evidence rows across 8,067 B2B software vendors, drawn from 10 sources. It measures drift: how much public compliance evidence lapsed, how old it is, and how coverage differs by framework and category. Every figure below is computed from stored rows, dated, and reproducible.
- 3.2%
- of evidence rows are past their date
- 503 of 15,529 rows
- 0%
- of DPF listings linked to vendors have lapsed
- 0 lapsed, 1,618 active
- 2.8%
- of the top 2,000 vendors carry a lapsed PCI DSS row
- 55 of 1,981 vendors by demand rank
Lapse rates by framework
A row lapses when its own evidence says so: a certificate expiry, a report period plus twelve months, a registry usage end date, a registry validation date plus twelve months, or a dated registry withdrawal. Active rows are verified or stated rows whose date has not passed. Registry records marked inactive that carry no date at all (3,466 rows, almost all historical Data Privacy Framework and Privacy Shield participants) are counted separately and left out of every lapse share, because they describe the list's history rather than drift in the period.
| Framework | Active rows | Lapsed rows | Lapse share | Expiring in 90 days | Inactive, undated | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCI DSS | 5,468 | 503 | 8.4% | 1,594 | 0 | custom, drata, vanta, visa_grsp, wolfia |
| EU-US Data Privacy Framework | 1,618 | 0 | 0.0% | 363 | 3,464 | dpf |
| SOC 2 | 806 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | csa_star, custom, drata, soc3, vanta, wolfia |
| FedRAMP | 759 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | custom, drata, fedramp, vanta, wolfia |
| CSA STAR | 518 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | csa_star, custom, drata, vanta, wolfia |
| GDPR | 471 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | custom, drata, vanta, wolfia |
| ISO/IEC 27001 | 469 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | csa_star, custom, drata, vanta, wolfia |
| CCPA / CPRA | 285 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | custom, drata, vanta, wolfia |
| HIPAA | 231 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | custom, drata, vanta, wolfia |
| SOC 3 | 105 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | custom, drata, soc3, vanta, wolfia |
| ISO/IEC 27017 | 98 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | custom, drata, vanta, wolfia |
| ISO/IEC 27701 | 98 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | custom, drata, vanta, wolfia |
| SOC 1 | 96 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | custom, drata, vanta, wolfia |
| ISO/IEC 27018 | 90 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | custom, drata, vanta, wolfia |
| ISO/IEC 42001 | 85 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | drata, vanta, wolfia |
| Cyber Essentials | 72 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | custom, drata, vanta, wolfia |
| TX-RAMP | 69 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | drata, vanta, wolfia |
| Cyber Essentials Plus | 40 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | drata, vanta |
| IRAP | 31 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | drata, vanta, wolfia |
| GovRAMP | 26 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | drata, vanta |
| BSI C5 | 22 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | drata, wolfia |
| ISO 22301 | 22 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | drata, vanta |
| TISAX | 21 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | drata, vanta, wolfia |
| HITRUST | 20 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | drata, vanta |
| ENS | 14 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | drata, vanta |
| DORA critical ICT provider designation | 10 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | dora_ctpp |
| ISO 9001 | 7 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | vanta |
Lapse share is lapsed divided by active plus lapsed, as of 26 Oct 2026. Inactive, undated registry records are excluded from the share.
- PCI DSS5038.4%
The top 2,000 vendors
The 2,000 highest-demand vendors in the catalogue (1,981 active) are the ones most reviews touch. This table asks a narrower question than the one above: how many of them carry at least one lapsed row per framework.
| Framework | Top-2,000 vendors with a row | With a lapsed row | Share of the top 2,000 |
|---|---|---|---|
| EU-US Data Privacy Framework | 1,019 | 0 | 0.0% |
| PCI DSS | 353 | 55 | 2.8% |
| SOC 2 | 275 | 0 | 0.0% |
| FedRAMP | 246 | 0 | 0.0% |
| CSA STAR | 220 | 0 | 0.0% |
| ISO/IEC 27001 | 207 | 0 | 0.0% |
| GDPR | 186 | 0 | 0.0% |
| CCPA / CPRA | 135 | 0 | 0.0% |
| HIPAA | 106 | 0 | 0.0% |
| ISO/IEC 27017 | 60 | 0 | 0.0% |
| ISO/IEC 27018 | 57 | 0 | 0.0% |
| SOC 3 | 54 | 0 | 0.0% |
| ISO/IEC 27701 | 54 | 0 | 0.0% |
| ISO/IEC 42001 | 50 | 0 | 0.0% |
| SOC 1 | 44 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Cyber Essentials | 39 | 0 | 0.0% |
| TX-RAMP | 36 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Cyber Essentials Plus | 23 | 0 | 0.0% |
| IRAP | 20 | 0 | 0.0% |
| BSI C5 | 16 | 0 | 0.0% |
| GovRAMP | 16 | 0 | 0.0% |
| TISAX | 14 | 0 | 0.0% |
| HITRUST | 11 | 0 | 0.0% |
| ENS | 11 | 0 | 0.0% |
| ISO 22301 | 8 | 0 | 0.0% |
| DORA critical ICT provider designation | 6 | 0 | 0.0% |
| ISO 9001 | 5 | 0 | 0.0% |
| ISMAP | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| HDS | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| NHS DSPT | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
Evidence age
Days between the capture date of each row and 26 Oct 2026. Registries are re-read nightly, so registry rows stay young; vendor-stated rows age until the page is captured again.
| Framework | Rows | Median age (days) | 90th percentile (days) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCI DSS | 5,971 | 7 | 21 |
| EU-US Data Privacy Framework | 5,082 | 7 | 7 |
| SOC 2 | 807 | 35 | 35 |
| FedRAMP | 759 | 1 | 1 |
| CSA STAR | 518 | 7 | 26 |
| GDPR | 471 | 35 | 35 |
| ISO/IEC 27001 | 469 | 26 | 35 |
| CCPA / CPRA | 285 | 26 | 35 |
| HIPAA | 231 | 26 | 35 |
| SOC 3 | 106 | 0 | 35 |
| ISO/IEC 27701 | 98 | 26 | 35 |
| ISO/IEC 27017 | 98 | 0 | 35 |
| SOC 1 | 96 | 26 | 35 |
| ISO/IEC 27018 | 90 | 0 | 35 |
| ISO/IEC 42001 | 85 | 26 | 35 |
| Cyber Essentials | 72 | 26 | 35 |
| TX-RAMP | 69 | 0 | 35 |
| Cyber Essentials Plus | 40 | 0 | 35 |
| IRAP | 31 | 0 | 35 |
| GovRAMP | 26 | 0 | 35 |
| BSI C5 | 22 | 0 | 35 |
| ISO 22301 | 22 | 35 | 35 |
| TISAX | 21 | 0 | 35 |
| HITRUST | 20 | 0 | 35 |
| ENS | 14 | 0 | 25 |
| DORA critical ICT provider designation | 10 | 7 | 7 |
HIPAA BAA coverage by category
Share of indexable vendors in each category with a public business associate agreement offer. There is no HIPAA certification; the offer is the public artefact.
| Category | Indexable vendors | With a public BAA offer | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Developer tools | 220 | 23 | 10.5% |
| AI tools | 96 | 23 | 24.0% |
| Data platforms | 69 | 13 | 18.8% |
| Analytics | 274 | 10 | 3.6% |
| Compliance and GRC | 179 | 10 | 5.6% |
| Security | 172 | 9 | 5.2% |
| Customer support | 109 | 8 | 7.3% |
| Healthcare | 90 | 8 | 8.9% |
| Communications and CPaaS | 45 | 8 | 17.8% |
| AI infrastructure | 34 | 8 | 23.5% |
| Cloud storage | 51 | 7 | 13.7% |
| Cloud and hosting | 144 | 6 | 4.2% |
| Project management | 51 | 6 | 11.8% |
| AI assistants | 28 | 6 | 21.4% |
| No-code and automation | 113 | 5 | 4.4% |
FedRAMP status mix
Statuses as published in the Marketplace data file at the last sync, plus vendor-stated rows from trust centres. Under the Consolidated Rules for 2026 the official label is "FedRAMP Certified"; rows carry the text the file published.
- FedRAMP Authorized534
- FedRAMP Ready70
- Agency In Process48
- Vendor states FedRAMP Moderate on its trust centre37
- Vendor states FedRAMP High on its trust centre20
- Vendor states FedRAMP on its trust centre15
- FedRAMP In Process12
- Vendor states FedRAMP Rev. 5 on its trust centre7
Data Privacy Framework usage end
- 1,618
- Active DPF listings linked to vendors
- 0
- Past their usage end date
- 0.0% of active plus lapsed
- 363
- Usage end dates in the next 90 days
- 3,464
- Inactive listings with no usage end date
- historical participants, excluded from the lapse share
Drift index
The drift index is the number of rows that lapsed or were removed in a month per 1,000 active rows. It is the time series behind the change log; the first observed month is September 2026, when the index went live, so the series is short and will lengthen with each report.
| Month | Added | Renewed | Lapsed | Removed | Other events | Drift per 1,000 active rows |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09 | 2561 | 371 | 50 | 53 | 10581 | 8.9 |
| 2026-10 | 40 | 1440 | 260 | 0 | 3497 | 22.5 |
- 2026-0913,616
- 2026-105,237
Events in the period
| Event type | Count |
|---|---|
| auditor changed | 2,550 |
| attestation renewed | 1,440 |
| vendor indexed | 777 |
| attestation expired | 260 |
| subprocessor added | 155 |
| attestation added | 40 |
| state changed | 13 |
| baa availability changed | 1 |
| dpa changed | 1 |
Trust reports behind the numbers
No high-demand vendor's evidence lapsed in October 2026. These are the highest-demand vendors with evidence due to lapse within 90 days of 26 Oct 2026. Each card is read live from the index, so it shows any renewal captured after the report was generated; the caption keeps the fact the report counted.

Google · Trust report
Cloud and hosting · Public evidence as of 26 Oct 2026
Framework overview
CertReports state for each framework with public evidence: 5 verified.

network · Trust report
Public evidence as of 26 Oct 2026
Framework overview
CertReports state for each framework with public evidence: 1 verified.
One · Trust report
Public evidence as of 26 Oct 2026
Framework overview
CertReports state for each framework with public evidence: 1 verified.
Method and sources
- Registry rows: FedRAMP Marketplace data file, Data Privacy Framework participant list, Visa Global Registry of Service Providers, CSA STAR registry, mirrored nightly.
- Vendor-stated rows: trust centres and security pages captured with a content hash and capture date.
- Lapse: expiry date, period end plus twelve months, usage end date, validation date plus twelve months, or withdrawal.
- Top 2,000: vendors ranked by demand in the CertReports catalogue.
- Drift index: (lapsed + removed) in the month divided by active rows at generation, per 1,000.
- Generated 26 Oct 2026. Figures for a closed month are frozen when the month ends; the current month is refreshed daily.
Cite this report
CertReports, Compliance drift report, October 2026. https://certreports.com/reports/2026-10. Figures as of 26 Oct 2026.