Skip to main content
Blink logo

Blink

UK GDPR evidence

The mobile-first employee experience platform that connects your people, systems, and culture in one

joinblink.comLast verified 21 Sep 2026
Request the report Are you Blink?

UK GDPR, with the Data Protection Act 2018

Blink against UK GDPR’s vendor requirements

4 provisions of UK GDPR reach the vendors you rely on. For each, the public evidence from Blink that may support it, with its date and source.

3 evidence found1 no public evidence
Article 28(1)

Use processors that provide sufficient guarantees

A controller shall use only processors providing sufficient guarantees to implement appropriate technical and organisational measures.

Evidence found

  • Independent security assurance

    Evidence found

    A current SOC 2 report or ISO/IEC 27001 certificate is the usual evidence that a supplier operates appropriate security measures.

    • SOC 2Vendor states SOC 2 on its trust centreas of 21 Sep 2026
    • ISO/IEC 27001Vendor states ISO 27001:2013 on its trust centreas of 21 Sep 2026
    • ISO certificate"Blink ISO 27001 certificate 2025" on the trust centreas of 21 Sep 2026
    • ISO certificate"Blink ISO 27001 certificate 2026" on the trust centreas of 21 Sep 2026
    • and 1 more

  • Security testing and documentation

    Evidence found

    A penetration test report, a completed standard questionnaire (SIG, CAIQ, HECVAT) or security documentation shows how the supplier tests and runs its controls.

Article 28(3)

Put processing under a written contract

Processing by a processor must be governed by a contract with the terms Article 28(3) lists, including documented instructions, confidentiality, security and assistance.

No public evidence

  • Data processing agreement

    No public evidence

    The DPA is where processing instructions, confidentiality, security, sub-processing and audit rights are written down.

Article 28(2) and (4)

Know and control sub-processors

Sub-processors need the controller’s authorisation, changes must be notified, and obligations flow down by contract.

Evidence found

  • Published subprocessor list

    Evidence found

    A current list of subprocessors, with purpose and location, is how a customer knows who else touches its data.

Articles 44 to 46

Transfer data outside the UK lawfully

Restricted transfers need UK adequacy regulations (including the UK Extension to the EU-US Data Privacy Framework) or appropriate safeguards such as the International Data Transfer Agreement or the UK Addendum to the EU SCCs.

Evidence found

  • Transfer mechanism

    Evidence found

    Transfers outside the EU or UK need a basis such as an adequacy decision (including the EU-US Data Privacy Framework) or standard contractual clauses.

  • Where data is hosted and processed

    Evidence found

    The regions or countries where the service runs and data is stored, from the vendor or its subprocessor list.

Questions buyers ask

Is Blink UK GDPR compliant?

CertReports does not decide that. It shows the public evidence that may support each UK GDPR requirement that reaches vendors: evidence was found or is available on request for use processors that provide sufficient guarantees (Article 28(1)), know and control sub-processors (Article 28(2) and (4)), transfer data outside the uk lawfully (Articles 44 to 46), and nothing public was found for put processing under a written contract.

What should I ask Blink for?

Request data processing agreement, and confirm each is current.

Reading for UK GDPR reviews

All articles

This maps third-party obligations to the vendor evidence that may support them. It is not legal advice and never a statement that a vendor or its customers comply; confirm scope and sufficiency with your counsel or auditor. “No public evidence” means nothing public was found at the last check. Citations link to the official text.

Requirements reviewed 21 Sep 2026. The vendor lists the evidence on its trust centre behind a request or NDA; ask for it.