Skip to main content
Clay logo

Clay

EU AI Act evidence

Infrastructure to get any data, run agentic workflows, and launch GTM

clay.comSales toolsLast verified 21 Sep 2026
Request the report Are you Clay?

Regulation (EU) 2024/1689

Clay against EU AI Act’s vendor requirements

3 provisions of EU AI Act reach the vendors you rely on. For each, the public evidence from Clay that may support it, with its date and source.

1 evidence found1 partial evidence1 no public evidence
Article 26(1) and Article 13

Use high-risk systems as the provider instructs

Deployers of high-risk AI systems must use them in accordance with the instructions for use, which Article 13 requires providers to supply with the system.

Partial evidence

  • AI model and system documentation

    No public evidence

    Model documentation, system cards and training data summaries are what a deployer or integrator reads to use an AI system as intended.

  • AI governance

    Evidence found

    An AI policy, a governance framework or an ISO/IEC 42001 certificate shows the supplier manages AI risk as a system.

    • ISO/IEC 42001Vendor states ISO 42001:2023 on its trust centreas of 21 Sep 2026
    • ISO/IEC 42001ISO/IEC 42001 listed on the trust centreas of 21 Sep 2026
Article 53(1)(b)

Documentation from general-purpose model providers

Providers of general-purpose AI models must draw up, keep up to date and make available information and documentation to providers of AI systems who intend to integrate the model.

No public evidence

  • AI model and system documentation

    No public evidence

    Model documentation, system cards and training data summaries are what a deployer or integrator reads to use an AI system as intended.

Article 25(4)

Written terms with suppliers in the AI value chain

The provider of a high-risk AI system and a third party supplying AI systems, tools, services or components used in it must specify by written agreement the information, capabilities, technical access and assistance needed to meet the Regulation.

Evidence found

  • AI governance

    Evidence found

    An AI policy, a governance framework or an ISO/IEC 42001 certificate shows the supplier manages AI risk as a system.

    • ISO/IEC 42001Vendor states ISO 42001:2023 on its trust centreas of 21 Sep 2026
    • ISO/IEC 42001ISO/IEC 42001 listed on the trust centreas of 21 Sep 2026

  • Use of customer data for training

    Evidence found

    A published answer on whether customer data trains the supplier’s models.

    • Use of customer data to train models"Can we opt-out of having our data used for AI training?" If Clay were to decide at some future date to make customer tables available for AI training, it would provide a mechanism for customers to opt out.as of 21 Sep 2026
    • Use of customer data to train models"Will Clay use our data for any AI training purposes?" No. Clay does not make customer tables available to third parties.as of 21 Sep 2026
    • Model training on customer dataVendor answers "no" on training models with customer dataas of 21 Sep 2026

Questions buyers ask

Is Clay EU AI Act compliant?

CertReports does not decide that. It shows the public evidence that may support each EU AI Act requirement that reaches vendors: evidence was found or is available on request for written terms with suppliers in the ai value chain (Article 25(4)), and nothing public was found for documentation from general-purpose model providers.

What should I ask Clay for?

Request ai model and system documentation, and confirm each is current.

Reading for EU AI Act reviews

All articles

This maps third-party obligations to the vendor evidence that may support them. It is not legal advice and never a statement that a vendor or its customers comply; confirm scope and sufficiency with your counsel or auditor. “No public evidence” means nothing public was found at the last check. Citations link to the official text.

Requirements reviewed 21 Sep 2026. The vendor lists the evidence on its trust centre behind a request or NDA; ask for it.