Summary
Discuss.io has 2 registry-verified rows in the CertReports index, last verified 17 Sep 2026. The strongest row is CSA STAR: STAR Level 1 self-assessment (CAIQ). This page is independent of the vendor’s own trust centre: dates, sources and caveats come from CertReports captures.
Reviewer brief
As of 17 Sep 2026, Discuss.io is listed in the CSA STAR registry with a STAR Level 1 self-assessment (CAIQ) dated 4 May 2023. As of 17 Sep 2026, Discuss.io is listed in the EU-US Data Privacy Framework registry with an active status covering the UK Extension Certification, EU-US Certification, and SW-US Certification, originally issued 5 Dec 2016 and set to expire 4 Mar 2027. As of 17 Sep 2026, no public evidence found for SOC 2 for Discuss.io. As of 17 Sep 2026, no public evidence found for HIPAA/BAA for Discuss.io. As of 17 Sep 2026, no subprocessor evidence was found in the supplied rows for Discuss.io.
- CSA STAR: listed in CSA STAR registry, STAR Level 1 self-assessment (CAIQ), issued 4 May 2023 (as of 17 Sep 2026)
- EU-US Data Privacy Framework: listed in DPF registry, active (EU-US, SW-US, UK Extension), issued 5 Dec 2016, expires 4 Mar 2027 (as of 17 Sep 2026)
- SOC 2 and HIPAA: no public evidence found as of 17 Sep 2026
Facts only, each dated; nothing here is inferred, scored or advised. Brief generated 17 Sep 2026; it is regenerated whenever a row changes.
Among customer support vendors
2verified rows
Category median 1, across 63 indexed customer support vendors. Discuss.io has more verified rows than 92 percent of them.
customer-feedbackqualitative-researchuser-interviewsvideo-conferencing
Compare with similar vendors
Pick your own comparisonCompliance grid
Legal artefacts
No DPA, BAA or subprocessor list has been captured from a public page yet. Registry rows above do not depend on this. Check the vendor trust centre.
Subprocessors
No subprocessor list captured yet.
Similar vendors with evidence
Related by product tags and the Customer support category, ranked by shared tags, description similarity and overlapping evidence. Never by popularity.
