Summary
Glitch has , and 1 expired in the CertReports index, last verified 26 Oct 2026. The strongest row is EU-US Data Privacy Framework: Inactive. This page is independent of the vendor’s own trust centre: dates, sources and caveats come from CertReports captures.
Reviewer brief
Glitch is listed in the EU-US Data Privacy Framework registry with a status of inactive, as of 17 Sep 2026, indicating the listing found for this vendor is not currently active. The Data Privacy Framework entry was issued 4 Dec 2017, as of 17 Sep 2026. No expiration date is recorded for this Data Privacy Framework listing in the evidence row, as of 17 Sep 2026. No public evidence found for SOC 2 as of 17 Sep 2026. No public evidence found for ISO/IEC 27001 as of 17 Sep 2026.
- EU-US Data Privacy Framework: listed in DPF registry, status inactive (expired), issued 4 Dec 2017, no expiration date recorded, as of 17 Sep 2026.
- SOC 2: no public evidence found, as of 17 Sep 2026.
- ISO/IEC 27001: no public evidence found, as of 17 Sep 2026.
Facts only, each dated; nothing here is inferred, scored or advised. Brief generated 25 Sep 2026; it is regenerated whenever a row changes.
Evidence count
0verified rows
collaborationdeploymentdeveloper platformweb development
Compliance grid
Legal artefacts
No DPA, BAA or subprocessor list has been captured from a public page yet. Registry rows above do not depend on this.
Subprocessors
No subprocessor list captured yet.
Change history
- 18 Sep 2026First indexed by CertReports1 evidence row across 1 framework entered the index.
Evidence against regulations
All regulations for GlitchHow much of each regulation’s vendor requirements Glitch’s public evidence reaches.
Reviewing a vendor on public evidence
All articlesWhat Is a Trust Centre? Vendor Evidence vs Office Settings
Solomon Amos · 28 Oct 2026 · 10 min read