Thomson Reuters
Security and trust center evidence
Summary
Thomson Reuters has 2 registry-verified rows in the CertReports index, last verified 17 Sep 2026. The strongest row is FedRAMP: Agency In Process. This page is independent of the vendor’s own trust centre: dates, sources and caveats come from CertReports captures.
Reviewer brief
As of 17 Sep 2026, Thomson Reuters is listed in the FedRAMP registry with a status of Agency In Process, per Schellman Compliance, LLC as auditor. As of 17 Sep 2026, Thomson Reuters is listed in the EU-US Data Privacy Framework registry as Active, covering EU-US Certification, SW-US Certification, and UK Extension Certification, issued 20 Jun 2024 and set to expire 10 Jun 2027. As of 17 Sep 2026, no public evidence found for SOC 2 status for Thomson Reuters. As of 17 Sep 2026, no public evidence found for HIPAA status for Thomson Reuters. As of 17 Sep 2026, no subprocessor evidence rows were found for Thomson Reuters.
- FedRAMP: listed in registry, status 'Agency In Process', as of 17 Sep 2026 (auditor: Schellman Compliance, LLC)
- EU-US Data Privacy Framework: listed in registry as Active (EU-US, SW-US, UK Extension Certifications), issued 20 Jun 2024, expires 10 Jun 2027, as of 17 Sep 2026
- SOC 2 and HIPAA: no public evidence found as of 17 Sep 2026
Facts only, each dated; nothing here is inferred, scored or advised. Brief generated 17 Sep 2026; it is regenerated whenever a row changes.
Among research and data providers vendors
2verified rows
Category median 0, across 20 indexed research and data providers vendors. Thomson Reuters has more verified rows than 100 percent of them.
compliance researchfinancial datalegal researchprofessional services
Compare with similar vendors
Pick your own comparisonCompliance grid
Legal artefacts
No DPA, BAA or subprocessor list has been captured from a public page yet. Registry rows above do not depend on this.
Subprocessors
No subprocessor list captured yet.
Similar vendors with evidence
Related by product tags and the Research and data providers category, ranked by shared tags, description similarity and overlapping evidence. Never by popularity.
