ZeroFOX

Security and trust center evidence

ZeroFox delivers actionable intelligence to discover, validate, and disrupt external threats at

zerofox.com Research and data providersLast verified 2 Nov 2026

Request the report Are you ZeroFOX?

SOC 2Vendor-stated

Cyber EssentialsVendor-stated

DPFVerified

ZeroFOX has 1 registry-verified row and 2 vendor-stated rows in the CertReports index, last verified 2 Nov 2026. The strongest row is SOC 2: Vendor states SOC 2 on its trust centre. This page is independent of the vendor’s own trust centre: dates, sources and caveats come from CertReports captures.

Reviewer brief

ZeroFOX states on its trust centre that it holds a SOC 2 report, as of 30 Sep 2026. ZeroFOX states on its trust centre that it holds UK Cyber Essentials, as of 30 Sep 2026. ZeroFOX is listed in the EU-US Data Privacy Framework registry as active, covering the EU-US, Swiss-US and UK Extension certifications, through 5 Oct 2027, as of 19 Oct 2026. No public evidence was found for PCI DSS as of 19 Oct 2026. No public evidence was found for ISO/IEC 27001 or HIPAA as of 19 Oct 2026.

SOC 2: vendor states it holds a SOC 2 report on trust centre (as of 30 Sep 2026)
Cyber Essentials: vendor states UK Cyber Essentials on trust centre (as of 30 Sep 2026); EU-US DPF listed active through 5 Oct 2027 (as of 19 Oct 2026)
No public evidence found for PCI DSS, ISO/IEC 27001, or HIPAA (as of 19 Oct 2026)

Facts only, each dated; nothing here is inferred, scored or advised. Brief generated 20 Oct 2026; it is regenerated whenever a row changes.

Among research and data providers vendors

1verified rows

Category median 0, across 147 indexed research and data providers vendors. ZeroFOX has more verified rows than 55 percent of them.

brand protectionexternal threat monitoringrisk managementthreat intelligence

Compare with similar vendors

Pick your own comparison

Compliance grid

No public evidence yet for HIPAA, GDPR, FedRAMP, PCI DSS, ISO 27001, CSA STAR, ISO 27701, ISO 42001. This does not mean the vendor lacks them; it means nothing public was found at the last check.

Legal artefacts

Subprocessor list

Public · 11 subprocessors listed on the trust centre · as of 30 Sep 2026

Open

Public · as of 30 Sep 2026

Open

Subprocessors (11)

Amazon Web ServicesCloud Services · Seattle, Washington, United States
AtlassianCustomer Support · San Francisco, California, United States
CloudflareContent Distribution & Security and Domain Name Service · San Francisco, California, United States
EL
ElasticLog Management · San Francisco, California, United States
Google Cloud PlatformCloud Services · San Jose, California, United States
SalesforceCRM Product Integration · San Francisco, California, United States
SendgridEmail Notifications · Denver, Colorado, United States
SlackCommunications Tool · San Francisco, California, United States
TI
Thum.ioURL Screenshot Generator · United States
ZendeskCustomer Support · San Francisco, California, United States
ZoomCommunications Tool · San Jose, California, United States

Change history

19 Oct 2026EU-US Data Privacy Framework state changedState moved from Expired to Verified.
12 Oct 2026EU-US Data Privacy Framework state changedState moved from Verified to Expired.
18 Sep 2026Subprocessor added: Amazon Web ServicesAmazon Web Services appeared on the subprocessor list.
18 Sep 2026Subprocessor added: AtlassianAtlassian appeared on the subprocessor list.
18 Sep 2026Subprocessor added: CloudflareCloudflare appeared on the subprocessor list.
18 Sep 2026Subprocessor added: ElasticElastic appeared on the subprocessor list.
18 Sep 2026Subprocessor added: Google Cloud PlatformGoogle Cloud Platform appeared on the subprocessor list.
18 Sep 2026Cyber Essentials evidence addedA Cyber Essentials row entered the index with state Vendor-stated.
18 Sep 2026Subprocessor added: SendgridSendgrid appeared on the subprocessor list.
18 Sep 2026Subprocessor added: SlackSlack appeared on the subprocessor list.

Similar vendors with evidence

Related by product tags and the Research and data providers category, ranked by shared tags, description similarity and overlapping evidence. Never by popularity.